Return to the Golf Today Home Page All the latest golf news Coverage of all the worlds major tours For all your golfing needs Golf Course Directory Out on the course Golf related travel Whats going on, message board, links and more!
 
Worldwide Feature Articles
 
Golftoday Latest
PGA: Stephen Ames coasts to six shot win
PGA: Tiger Woods ends difficult week with 75
Euro: Van de Velde ends 13 year victory wait
Stephen Ames vaults to World No. 27
Boost for the Philippine Open
Tiger Woods misses practice to be with father

US Supreme Court hear "Cart" case

Supreme Court justices held a spirited debate about golf, baseball and a key disability-rights law today in considering whether disabled golfer Casey Martin has a legal right to use a cart between shots at PGA Tour events.

The PGA Tour's lawyer told the justices that the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act does not require the tour to waive its requirement that players walk the course during tournaments.

But Martin's lawyer, Roy L. Reardon, contended walking is not fundamental to the game of golf, unlike the size of the hole or where a player hits the ball. ``He plays every single rule of the game'' even with a golf cart, Reardon said.

Justice Antonin Scalia suggested Reardon's argument only demonstrates ``that you can play the game under a different rule.''

``Is it fundamental to baseball that the strike zone be from the shoulders to the knees?'' Scalia asked. ``It could be from the eyes to the hips, couldn't it? ... All sports rules are silly rules, aren't they?''

Minutes later, Scalia said that if some justices appeared to know as little about baseball as they did about golf, ``the former would be a much greater sin.''

``Wait a minute,'' interjected Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a longtime golfer.

``In dissent again,'' added Justice John Paul Stevens as the courtroom audience began to laugh.

The PGA Tour's lawyer, H. Bartow Farr III, said golf is ``nothing more or less than a competition that tests excellence in performing what the rules require.'' Allowing Martin to use a golf cart would fundamentally alter the nature of the competition, which the PGA is not obligated to do under the ADA, Farr said.

Reardon contended walking was not a fundamental rule and that the ADA gave people ``like Casey Martin a chance to get to the game.''

Justice Stephen G. Breyer questioned who would determine whether a particular sports rule was fundamental to a game. ``What's the system for finding out?'' he asked.

Reardon said courts often decide questions involving public accommodations, and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy added, ``We get into a lot of unexpected areas around here.'' Just last month, the nation's highest court issued a 5-4 decision that in effect handed the presidential election to George W. Bush, stopping a Florida recount sought by Al Gore.

After Wednesday's argument, the justices are expected to issue a ruling by July that could clarify the ADA's scope.

The 1990 law, perhaps best known for requiring wheelchair ramps in buildings across the country, bans discrimination against the disabled in housing, employment and public accommodations.

Public accommodations include golf courses, places of exercise and ``any place of exhibition or entertainment.'' The law requires ``reasonable modifications'' for disabled people unless such changes would fundamentally alter the nature of the place or event.

Casey Martin in action. Allsport.

Martin, 28, has a circulatory disorder in his right leg that makes it painful for him to walk long distances. The disorder is called Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome.

Martin sued the PGA Tour in 1997, saying the ADA gave him a right to use a cart during tour events. The tour argued that it had the right to set uniform rules for its tournaments.

A federal judge ruled for Martin, saying that allowing him to use a cart would not fundamentally alter tour events because he would suffer more fatigue than other golfers even if he used a cart.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in March 2000, saying that using a cart would not give Martin an unfair advantage over his competitors.

But the following day, a Chicago-based federal appeals court ruled against Indiana golfer Ford Olinger, who sued the USGA for the right to use a cart during U.S. Open qualifying. The appeals court decided a cart would change the nature of competition.

The PGA Tour's appeal to the Supreme Court is being supported by the USGA in a friend-of-the-court brief. Also backing the tour are the LPGA and the men's pro tennis organization, the ATP Tour.

Martin is being supported by a number of disability-rights groups including the National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems, the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund and the National Federation of the Blind.

The case is PGA Tour v. Martin, 00-24.


Email this page to a friend | Return to top of page