|
Golf
News: -
Posted 24th February 1998
Spalding sued
by Callaway over new golf ball
Santa
Ana, California - Spalding, makers of golf balls for over
100 years, is being sued by Callaway in an attempt to stop "consumer
confusion regarding a new Spalding golf ball".
The lawsuit
filed yesterday in the US District Court in Santa Ana by Callaway
Golf Co against Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc. asks for a court
order stopping Spalding from using Callaway trademarks and images
on its packaging
The ball. the
Top-Flite Ball/Club
System, was announced by Spalding last month at the PGA Merchandise
Show in Orlando, Fla claiming it was designed to maximise performance
with the Taylor-Made Ti Bubble 2 drivers and the Callaway Great
Big Bertha drivers.While the balls are not expected to be marketed
until 15th March the packaging displayed the Callaway and Taylor
Made names along with images of the Great Big Bertha and Ti Bubble
2 drivers.
Callaway claim
that some 5 million golfers play the Big Bertha driver and it has
now accused Spalding of "attempting to confuse those golfers,
and others, into believing that Callaway Golf supports the use of
the new ball with its drivers."
"They
don't plan to ship until March so everyone is moving as quickly
as possible to get this before the court before the shipments start",
said Callaway's chief legal officer, Steve McCracken.
"If Spalding
wants to promote a new product, it should do so using its own name
and reputation, not ours," said Eli Callaway, the company founder.
"We have
nothing to do with this ball, and have not even been given the opportunity
to test one. We don't know if their claims are true or not.We want
nothing to do with what might be a marketing gimmick," said
Callaway.
On hearing
about the suit Taylor Made president, George Montgomery, said "We
find it hard to believe that this is anything more than a marketing
ploy that provides no real unique technological benefits to golfers
using Ti Bubble 2 Metalwoods." He added that Taylor Made has
not ruled out legal action against Spalding.
The Callaway
suit is asking Spalding to stop using the Callaway trademark on
its packing, that it destroys existing packaging, that its accounts
for all profits from the sale of the System C ball and that any
damages awarded to Callaway be tripled because of Spalding's "intentional
and wilful conduct".
Spalding said
it would "vigorously defend its packaging," which contains
a prominent disclaimer on the front of its box saying Callaway has
nothing to do with the ball.
"We reviewed
this packaging with our legal staff prior to launching the product,"
said John Hoagland, managing director of Top-Flite Golf Ball and
Etonic Golf. "They gave us clearance and we are confident the
court will agree," he added.
The action
takes on more significance with Callaway planning to introduce its
own golf ball next year.
|